tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-839722827888249291.post8177341961066888965..comments2024-01-17T05:25:58.816-05:00Comments on RED STICK RANT: Numbers For Truth......CLIFFORDhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16404394356250504673noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-839722827888249291.post-15073495286255707742010-01-28T23:03:37.787-06:002010-01-28T23:03:37.787-06:00Clifford: "No, most people do not - and have ...Clifford: "No, most people do not - and have not - questioned the official narrative, because there is NO empirical evidence that you, or anyone on your side, can present to support your claim."<br /><br />Okay, but my point was how many people even know what the official explanation is. Before the discussion can continue I need for you to explain the official explanation, only then will the criticisms of it be understood.<br /><br />Can you do that?tanabearhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13683878890408974918noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-839722827888249291.post-4600994731813047152010-01-27T06:05:17.600-06:002010-01-27T06:05:17.600-06:00Oh silly me; here I thought terrorists were trying...Oh silly me; here I thought terrorists were trying to kill Americans. I forgot the number one reason Americans are murdered; it's Bush's fault. Muslim radicals are really sweet and loving by nature; all this "terrorist" stuff is just a conspiracy by the Bush family to take over the world.<br /><br />So when we get hit hard again (and at this rate, we will relatively soon), can we blame Obama? After all, he'd has much more to gain by crushing Americans.Just Mehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12858984705804810792noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-839722827888249291.post-27245559450459845902010-01-26T11:12:59.442-06:002010-01-26T11:12:59.442-06:001. For the spectacle. The purpose of terror attack...1. For the spectacle. The purpose of terror attacks is, in fact, terror. <br /><br />It would be much harder to blame controlled demolition on foreign terrorists, so planes were needed and the demolitions were to clean up the evidence. <br /><br />2. You could possibly make that argument for one building, perhaps. But how can three buildings completely collapse at near free fall speed from two planes?<br /><br />In regards to the 700 vs. 141,000 argument, you're trying to include neutral parties. If you haven't looked at the evidence, you obviously won't have an opinion so of those, they could go either way. The point is, over 700 have actually looked at the evidence and determined that we need a new investigation. <br /><br />You could use your argument to disprove any argument, to simply state that merely because a larger demographic exists than has signed on to any one side, that instantly disproves the argument of one side in particular. Makes no sense.bfreedomnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-839722827888249291.post-20221574764552053392010-01-25T20:21:24.283-06:002010-01-25T20:21:24.283-06:00I still wonder two things:
1. If the twin towers ...I still wonder two things:<br /><br />1. If the twin towers were taken down in controlled demolitions, then why on earth would you go through the hassle of hijacking four different airplanes? Was it a coincidence that jihadist freaks hit the Pentagon and were miraculously taken down over Pennsylvania on the same day? And how do the Truthers propose to explain those other two hijackings?<br /><br />2. How difficult is it to believe that a jumbo jet hitting a building at a couple hundred miles an hour and spewing an ocean of jet fuel all over a building might compromise its structural integrity? It really doesn't seem like much of a stretch to think that if you do THAT to a building, it will come down. Buildings aren't built to withstand a jumbo jet plowing into the 75th floor.MacAoidhhttp://www.thehayride.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-839722827888249291.post-43316226636608983932010-01-25T19:23:41.200-06:002010-01-25T19:23:41.200-06:00tanabear:
Your time is up. Didn't think you ...tanabear:<br /><br />Your time is up. Didn't think you could......CLIFFORDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16404394356250504673noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-839722827888249291.post-80034445729095138182010-01-25T19:21:24.067-06:002010-01-25T19:21:24.067-06:00This comment has been removed by the author......CLIFFORDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16404394356250504673noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-839722827888249291.post-46224709526269239752010-01-25T18:51:15.119-06:002010-01-25T18:51:15.119-06:00tanabear:
The number is relevant because Truthe...tanabear: <br /><br />The number is relevant because Truthers use it as proof that their theories have credibility with those who should know. Richard Gage uses it quite often in his YouTube videos for just that point. <br /><br />No, most people do not - and have not - questioned the official narrative, because there is NO empirical evidence that you, or anyone on your side, can present to support your claim. The best you have is circumstantial conjecture, subjective interpretations, and inference. <br /><br />If you KNOW what happened, please write a cogent argument for your position in your own words (no Google pasting). And present the math - I understand statics and dynamics (again, no Google pasting). I presume you are a licensed are a licensed architect or engineer, so I'll give you 30 minutes, starting... now.<br /><br />P.S. Besides being an architect, I was in the engineers in the Army. So know about, and have handled, thermite. Just so you know......CLIFFORDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16404394356250504673noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-839722827888249291.post-91025983594068882572010-01-25T18:24:23.652-06:002010-01-25T18:24:23.652-06:00Currently there are over 1,000 architects and engi...Currently there are over 1,000 architects and engineers who have signed the petition demanding a new investigation into 9/11. The total number of architects in the United States is unimportant. That number is only relevant if they have specifically stated that they agree with conclusions reached by NIST and can state what those conclustions are. This would be a very small percentage of all the architects in the US.<br /><br />Most people when presented with the evidence do begin to question the official narrative. For instance, NIST now admits that WTC7 did enter free-fall for 2.25 seconds or 8 stories. This is something they initially denied. How can this phenomenon be explained by NIST's fire theory? It can't. A demolition hypothesis can best explain the visual evidence. The evidence that 9/11 was a false flag terror event is overwhelming at this point. <br /><br />The Truth Marches On...tanabearhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13683878890408974918noreply@blogger.com